I know lots of other bloggers are doing it too so I'm just going to be added to that pile.
I'm taking a break from the blog to take care of some personal business. I'll still be reading your blogs.
See ya.
Mel informs me that hiatus is not 7 letters. Duh. Although Hay points out I should just spell it hiatuss and then there's no misunderstanding.
22 comments:
I'll keep checking to see when you return.
Will miss you. Come back to us soon!
We'll be here when you get back. :)
AUGH! Hurry back!
You best be back by the time I get my new computer.
*SNIFF* *SNIFF*
Aye Poppy
*SNIFF* *SNIFF*
I hope all is well/goes well
D'oh.
We were just getting started. ;-P
I'll hang around just in case.
Later!
See you when you get back!
We will all have our noses pressed against the glass till then.
I guess when you come back as the brand-new Pop after your sex change operation, the wait will be worth it.
As we like to say in the south...
"Come back when you can't stay so long..."
(I was going to say "we'll be here when you get back" but joefish stoled it)
What?? Poppy, if you stop blogging, who will post 27 entries for me to catch up on when I take a few days off reading?? ;-)
Seriously, though, hope to see your crazy antics around here again soon. :-)
My nose is up against the glass with RW's...you've got my e-mail if you need anything, k cool? Hope 'personal' is ok...
Did I mention that I will miss you?
okay it's a new month now, are you blogging again?
;-)
I need my Poppy fix!! Come back!
I'll bet you can't stay away long. You're one of the most energetic, consistent bloggers I know. A true publisher and your own gatekeeper.
love you, girl.
IN OTHER NEWS, Avi continues to be fresh though Poppy is not here ... buy, hey! Who isn't surprised? ;P
Me? Fresh?
Never!
Chicken - Thanks. :)
Mel - Thanks. :)
Joe - Thanks. :) :)
LM - Here I am. :)
Sour - Yes, Ma'am. :)
Dawg - It's all fine. I hope you're taking a multi-vitamin. :)
Mike - What were we getting started doing? Did we form a band and no one told me I was doing lead vocals?!?? :)
OD - Thanks. :)
RW - You need to clean the glass now, your nose left a print. :)
Avi - Please now address me as Paul. ;)
wHall - Joe has a way of stealing the best lines, hehe. :)
Stef - My crazy antics return today. :)
Tug - Thanks. :)
LM - :)
Mike - Impatience! ;)
Mel - Here I am! :)
Dan - Your comment replayed over and over in my head the last few days. At first I was defiant to it, but you're right. :)
Crys - Love you too. And thank you. :)
Spénce - He can't help it, he has Poppy Tourettes. ;)
Avi - You are funky fresh dressed to impress ready to party, just like Missy "Misdemeanor" Elliott.
Dan said: "A true publisher and your own gatekeeper."
Know who else is a gatekeeper? Ever heard of the blog MoxieGrrrl.com? If you haven’t don’t feel bad, most people haven’t heard of it either. Just wanted to let everyone here know that Moxie is what’s known as a Left gatekeeper, which is someone like Michael Moore or Amy Goodman or Noam Chomsky or Bill Maher etc., who at first blush appears to be a genuine leftist but who strives tirelessly to steer discourse away from matters that would be the most damaging to the establishment, for example 9/11 and U.S. government complicity. She goes about it in quite an immature fashion too, in deleting anyone’s posts she can’t disprove. For a while she didn’t delete posts but just clammed up whenever someone mentioned the 9/11 false flag operation, and for a while I gave her the benefit of the doubt, thinking “Perhaps she’s just very psychologically cowardly and can’t bear to face unpleasant facts”. Well now she is deleting peoples’ posts that she cannot disprove and I’ve called her out on it. Moxie Grrrl is a dupe and a Left gatekeeper. So if you want to go see a blogger that pretends to be edgy and leftist but is nothing more than a gutless, soulless Left gatekeeper carrying water for the mass murderers who brought you the 9/11 inside job, then by all means go to MoxieGrrrl.com. If you want genuine political discourse, go elsewhere. Thank you for your time.
P.S.-- If you don't think 9/11 was an inside job consider this: People in the reality-based community should have no problem whatsoever in realizing that the uppermost portion of a skyscraper is not going to be able to "fall" into and THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building as quickly, meaning as effortlessly as falling through air without something else (i.e. explosives) reducing said majority of building to such a state of offering no more resistance than air. Can we all agree on that? Sounds pretty straightforward; solid things offer vastly more resistance than air. Anyone who graduated elementary school SHOULD be able to grasp this, and SHOULD be able to therefore grasp that the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 building had to have been controlled demolitions. This is common sense.
Post a Comment